If you consider yourself having "less" of anything in life, it means you are tied to various limits, which means you are/become surrounded by many "rules" or "restraints" in general, and such restrictions are in fact NOT limiting you like it "Seem" to you, but rather. Now its time to give my own practical meaning of the phrase in a bit of detail, following the rules i stated above. So if anyone does NOT EXACTLY follow that analogy, then it does NOT fit with the root concept of the phrase, and immediately flags their thoughts as "false". and from "THAT" outcome, the REAL "more" will get out. Meaning, we must seek something that "Adds" *MORE* of "something", and that thing must end up in *LESS* as result. Thus, to start this philosophical decryption process, we will start from "last to start" algorithm. so the *natural* way to decrypt this phrase is by starting on its "own" wave. |LESS IS MORE| as we can see here, the phrase is going in the "opposite" direction of its each original meaning of the words. So now lets properly ANALYZE the phrase philosophically together : we are going to prove the universal "FACT" inside it. I saw from people's replies that they "Think" this whole thing means that ANYTHING could be inserted here and "Force" fit it with the shallow meaning of the phrase.īut the truth is, no you CANNOT force it on anything, because we are not aiming to do mere "Expressions" here, but rather. While trying to cover most if not "All" possibilities in existence that revolve around it.ĭue to many confused answers i read, i would like to explain how this phrase works to begin with in its deepest philosophical meaning. Its the response that goes according to the core natural design of the phrase in question, Many others also asked what is a "perfect" response to this little puzzle. so for now, i will definitely tell you all that there is only 1 universal truth in everything in existence. Many of the replies i received seems to go toward there is no possible "Single" fact about right or wrong in philosophies, and to life itself.īut for this alone i have already made a theory and DESTROYED it few years ago, but i will not tackle it here since it needs its own time.
0 kommentar(er)
